Sustainable Learning Journey Blog | Edibles Advocate Alliance (TM)
Bookmark and Share

About this Blog

Sustainable Learning Journey

Edibles Advocate Alliance (TM) is the leader of the local, sustainable food & agriculture movements.  The Sustainable Learning Journey Blog ties together health information, ecological advocacy, green living, environmental awareness, and sustainable food and agricultural knowledge into a cross-spectrum of learning opportunities.

LISTEN to this Blog

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow Along!

Bookmark and Share

Join the Conversation!

 

Subscribe to the EAA Newsletter

Subscribe to the Edibles Advocate Alliance Newsletter!

 alliance for sustainable food advocates, sustainable food alliance, food alliance

THE ALLIANCE 4 SUSTAINABLE FOOD ADVOCATES is a networking group created by Emily Brooks to unite those who support local agriculture, sustainable farming, local food production, and sustainable food systems.  The development of local, living economies rests on our nation-wide collaboration as we change the social norm towards agricultural sustainability, farmer & producer support, and small business development.

Participate on:

LinkedIn or Facebook

 

The Sustainable Learning Journey Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Global Problems Are Not My Fault?

  
  
  
  
  
  
  

In 2009, "Global" became the most bantered, misunderstood, and most overused adjective. We have "global challenges" that require "global agreements" with "global alliances."

Janet Daley thinks that "global" thinking won't necessarily solve the world's problems.

Thinking of problems in a global context endangers the fundamentally basic principles of accountability - the accountability of our own actions to our immediate environments, and the accountability of our elected officials to our country and with our engagement with other world leaders.

There are no "global challenges." Many countries and many individuals may face the same issues. Labeling a challenge or an impending issue as a "global" one means that we assume that my contributory actions are the same actions of everyone who faces the same issue, that my reparative responses must be identical to the responses of everyone else in every other country, and that we must have a 100% consensus of agreement to which remedial responses every country on the planet will choose -- regardless of the differences in our societies, our political governance, or our cultural norms and values.

The idea that our elected officials might not necessarily need to take action because an issue is a "global challenge" is scapegoat with a capital S.

Requiring "global responses" to our impending issues leads to an apathetic "Well it's not MY fault!" mentality. If my country doesn't agree with Zimbabwe, and if Zimbabwe doesn't agree with Israel, and Israel doesn't agree with Columbia - then neither Zimbabwe, Israel, or Columbia should take any corrective action yet to resolve our "global issues" until they all agree.

Regardless of the adjective-du-jour, the bottom line is that we are ALL ACCOUNTABLE FOR OUR OWN ACTIONS.

global problems


No clever shift in linguistics will ever absolve us of that fundamental fact. On the home front, we are equally apathetic. We know what problems face our society and we wait to employ better, corrective decisions in our daily lives while our elected leaders attend world summits.

Climate change, high obesity rates, bank collapses, the mortgage crisis . . . . . . . . What have we do to contribute to these problems and what are we going to do to take corrective action? At home? In our businesses? In our neighborhoods?

 

Edibles Advocate Alliance

Comments

I agree with your views. The hall-mark of my work over 30 years as a leader of voluntary agency ARTIC is promoting equity, self-reliance and social justice. 
The INGO who were supporting my works from the year 2000 started adopting Right based approach and advocacy as their instrument.  
This I believe shifted the emphasis from self-reliance to dependency. Their philosophy of States responsibility shifted the onus from local community to the distant government. They shifted their support and investment on capacity building for local action for problem solving to networking for collective petitioning, costly advocacy meetings that drew a lot publicity the problem remaining static.  
I believe Problem solving must begin locally then it will involve the local people and result in a sustainable solution.
Posted @ Thursday, September 01, 2011 8:11 PM by H.R.Prakash
That's all good and well, however when I sell a flat of strawberries folks wonder why I can't match the prices coming out of Mexico or other third world countries and shop for the cheapest prices. How do we fix a broken system that has us farmers over a barrel?
Posted @ Friday, September 02, 2011 6:51 AM by Jake's Farm
I have spoken to this issue before, based on micro local grow environments. I agree each are unique and each require local solutions. There is no one size fits all or even most blanket and looking for one is the wrong step forward. 
 
 
 
I also believe we know what works best and what our consumer needs are at each local operation.  
 
 
 
Yet, I would be lost without following what is going on with our food grows across the globe. We can stay local and still stay engaged across the globe by learning and adding to each others initiatives, not controlling them.
Posted @ Friday, September 02, 2011 10:31 AM by Bridget Guzzi
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics